Piercing the Corporate Veil/Alter Ego. Disponibles para realizar emprendimientos productivos, vivienda de fin de semana o vivienda permanente, segn cada gusto. 2d at 543-44; Hilton Oil Transp., 659 So. Dealer360, Inc. and Jaylee's Auto Sales, Inc. have filed an answer and affirmative defenses to the Supplemental Complaint. The court found that the corporate veil could be pierced whenany of the asserted veil-piercing strands are met. For example, if a creditor knows that a company is undercapitalized, but fails to require a personal guaranty and continues to extend a credit, a court may find that the right pierce the corporate veil is waived. Texas law has a long history when it comes to determining liability for fraudulent corporate shareholders and their affiliates. All Rights Reserved. c) Directors always have to use the correct business judgment. Second, piercing also is done by courts in order to remedy what appears to be fraudulent conduct that does not the strict elements of common law fraud. In such a situation, the creditor may also be precluded from piercing the corporate veil under the doctrine of estoppel. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. Chief among them, and a big reason why many incorporate, is being shielded from personal liability. Often, this alter ego claim is the most crucial element in business litigation. Significantly, we find no piercing cases in which a court pierces the corporate veil solely because a corporation is undercapitalized. Has an individual or others siphoned off funds or commingled their funds with the corporations? One such situations where courts will pierce the corporate veil and attach personal liability is where the corporation is truly an alter ego of another company or, based on a totality of circumstances, finds that the corporation is merely a fraud. Shareholders are often said to exist behind a "corporate veil", protected from liability for the actions of the company. at 272-73 (quoting Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations 5 at 40 (1942). meritless affirmative defenses that are "nothing but bare bones conclusory allegations." Id. For example, veil piercing may be done where the corporation is the mere alter-ego of its shareholders, where the corporation is undercapitalized, where there is a failure to observe corporate formalities, where the corporate form is used to promote fraud, injustice or illegalities. to you even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in that matter. No creditor or plaintiff can ever come after the incorporators personal property. . 1. Not Following Corporate Formalities. An alternative method exists for a plaintiff who may not be able to overcome such a high burden at the outset of litigation: piercing the corporate veil through post-judgment garnishment actions. [2], Apparently inconsistent with the limited liability nature of the corporate enterprise, the list of justifications for piercing the corporate veil is long, imprecise to the point of vagueness and less than reassuring to investors and other participants in the corporate enterprise interested in knowing with certainty what the limitations are on the scope of shareholders personal liability for corporate acts. Putting in place a standard procedure and documenting your process can help avoid liability for you and your company. Fax: 713-255-4426 You should consult with an attorney to review the current status of the law and how it applies to your unique circumstances before deciding to takeor refrain from takingany action. Generally speaking, the plaintiff seeking damages must prove that the corporation is indeed influenced by a certain person or persons, that any separation of this person or persons and the corporation never truly existed (other than on paper), and that under the current . The "corporate veil" protects business owners in a corporation or an LLC by shielding them from being held personally liable for their business activities. If a court pierces a company's corporate veil, the owners, shareholders, or members of a corporation or LLC can be held personally liable for corporate debts. Trial lawyers rou-tinely assert the alter ego doctrine on behalf of their clients. THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Beaumont, TX 77706 Under the mere instrumentality theory, the plaintiff must establish that the parent corporations control is to such a degree that the subsidiary is a mere instrumentality of the parent. The original term for this action, Lifting the Corporate Veil, has morphed into the more aggressive phrase, Piercing the Corporate Veil with a goal to provide justice and equity for individuals who have been harmed by owners attempting to hide behind a sham corporation or limited liability company. In such a situation, the court will attach personal liability to the business owners. Consequently, some observers feel it would be unjust to hold LLC officers and owners to the same standards. Co., S.A., 659 So. Under the alter ego theory, the plaintiff must establish that the shareholder dominated and controlled the corporation to such an extent that the corporations independent existence, was in fact non-existent and the shareholders were in fact alter egos of the corporation. Gasparini v. Pordomingo, 972 So. Certainly you have the right to be paid. Fax: (262) 334-9193, Disclaimer: The information contained in this post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Lotes lindantes ubicados entre las calles 10 y 11. While piercing the corporate veil is difficult regardless of the timing, knowing the strategic advantages of veil piercing at the pre-judgment stage versus the post-judgment stage could increase a plaintiffs probability of collecting its judgment. E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com, Fort Worth Office If the plaintiff can prove that the corporate owners or shareholders acted in certain ways, then a court may allow the corporate veil or shield of immunity to be pierced or deemed unenforceable. No. The 3rd District Court of Appeal disagreed, finding that none of the three elements needed to show that the company was an alter ego of Segal or could be pierced existed. 2d at 1151-52. This means they need to have their own finances, owners, and buildings. E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com. Piercing the corporate veil is the judicial act of imposing personal liability on the shareholders and/or directors of a corporation by "lifting the corporate veil", in contravention to the usual policy that a corporation is a separate legal entity and provides limited liability protection to its shareholders and directors from business debts . If the creditor was aware that the corporation lacked sufficient assets or was struggling but nevertheless continued to conduct business to its detriment, the creditor may be estopped from asserting that it was undercapitalized. Other similar businesses such as gas stations, auto body shops, or mobile home operations are subject to regulations promulgated by the DATCP and any unfair business dealings or other consumer protection violations committed by a shareholder of his or her own volition could be held liable. Most significantly in our view, we find that the application of topic modeling demonstrates that the distribution of ideas in the text of these opinions tracks our theories more or less precisely. 2060 North Loop West Ste. According to Castleberry, the definition of actual fraud is dishonesty of purpose or intent to deceive, including all of the elements of fraud. 34. This method exercised by the court is called "piercing the corporate veil in which the . (B) observe any requirement prescribed by this code or the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation for acts to be taken by the corporation or its directors or shareholders. See Turner Murphy Co. v. Specialty Constructors, Inc., 659 So. Texas courts continue to grapple with how best to define and pursue this type of fraud, and the laws continue to evolve as result of those efforts. of CPLR 3013 that pleadings provide sufficient detail of the plaintiffs grievances to enable the defendant to prepare a defense, . Suite 200Wilmington, DE 19801 E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com, Austin Office Examples of fraud include, for example, the transfer of funds from the corporation to family members of the owner when the owner retained control of the funds after the transfer and showed a lack of consideration for the transfer. C.R.S. at 470; see also Ally v. Naim, 581 So. The Court of Chancery recently issued an opinion reiterating that "piercing the veil" of a Delaware LLC - meaning the court disregards an LLC and imposes liability on the underlying owner (s) - is an extraordinary equitable remedy. A corporation must remain separate from its owners in all aspects. P: 215-735-7200 | F: 215-735-1714, 2605 Nicholson Road, Building V 2d 1182, 1184-85 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). See, Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp. 2023 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC. However, little do some business owners know, the protection from personal liability in a corporation is not absolute. Jarrod Melson. The party raising the affirmative defense has the burden of proof on establishing that it applies. As such, courts typically require corporations to engage in fairly egregious actions in order to justify piercing the corporate veil. Marcados en el mapa con un crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin. [], Posted by Jonathan R. Macey, Yale Law School, on, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, Authors Home in On Three Reasons to Pierce Corporate Veil | Law.com. West Bend, WI 53095, Phone: (262) 334-3471 Piercing the veil. As a separate entity, a corporation or limited liability company (LLC) is set up to "shield" the owners of the corporation (or members of the . the "alter-egos") to be held liable in certain circumstances. - All Rights Reserved, Community Advocacy & Social Responsibility, Traditional Contract Principles Impacting Enforcement of Noncompete Agreements in Florida. 3 Solved Example on Piercing the Corporate Veil. 2019). [3]. 777 Main Street, Ste. Posted on: Mar 4 2019; The title of a today's post sums up the difficulties a plaintiff encounters when trying to pierce the corporate veil to hold a corporate officer, director or shareholder responsible for the wrongs alleged to have been perpetrated on the plaintiff. Users of this site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for a full and complete review of their legal issues. El Parque posee caminos que llevan a la Playa El Doradillo, situada a cuatro kilmetros de distancia y desde donde las ballenas pueden ser vistas en sus costas. That way won't think they can stand behind the Corporate Veil and be protected in every possible situation. Limited liability companies are a concept of recent vintage and designed to allow owners to forego many of the usual corporate formalities. Corporations are separate entities from the shareholders and officers and have the right to sue on their own or be sued individually. There, the court analyzed the eight factors used in Colorado to determine if an entity is the alter ego . If a corporation does not follow the formalities necessary as enunciated by the state, courts may attach personal liability. Fla. 1984). 250 Courts will consider multiple factors in determining when to pierce the veil, including: (1) gross undercapitalization of the corporation; (2) failure to observe corporate formalities; (3) substantial commingling of corporate and personal affairs; and (4) use of the corporate form to perpetuate a fraud. (3) any obligation of the corporation on the basis of the failure of the corporation to observe any corporate formality, including the failure to: (A) comply with this code or the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation; or. Piercing the corporate veil is also referred to as the Alter Ego Doctrine. When the owner of the corporation uses control of that corporation to further the owners own business rather than the business of the corporation, the owner becomes liable pursuant to the principle of respondent superior (which holds that an employer is responsible for the workers actions performed within the course of their employment). M.D. P: 212-968-8300 | F: 212-968-9840, 17 West John Street since a plaintiff does need to show all three parts of the test to demonstrate that the shareholder or officer intended from the corporations inception to undercapitalize it, never subsequently infused it with adequate capital, failed to follow corporate formalities, and that such actions resulted in an injustice. 2 Piercing the Corporate Veil. There are two types of reverse piercing cases. Before discussing the most important factors of veil piercing, it is important to understand what it means to pierce the corporate veil. Suite 950New York, NY 10006 Importantly, after initially stating that no veil-piercing is the default, the statute goes on to state in subsection (b) that veil-piercing is in fact allowed in cases where actual fraud occurs for the direct personal benefit of the defendant: (b) Subsection (a)(2) does not prevent or limit the liability of a holder, beneficial owner, subscriber, or affiliate if the obligee demonstrates that the holder, beneficial owner, subscriber, or affiliate caused the corporation to be used for the purpose of perpetrating and did perpetrate an actual fraud on the obligee primarily for the direct personal benefit of the holder, beneficial owner, subscriber, or affiliate. TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE There is no evidence of any of the bases for piercing the corporate veil alleged by Plaintiff, nor any evidence to demonstrate how the same sanctioned a fraud or promoted an injustice toward the Plaintiff landlord. 1. If your business is incorporated, you must follow the formalities involved, including holding meetings, keeping the minutes of such meetings, and other requirements. Do not, under any circumstances, allow for the commingling of personal and corporate funds, as it is perhaps the most easily avoidable situation of corporate piercing. Members of a limited liability company are personally liable for any act, debt, obligation, or liability of the limited liability company to the extent that shareholders of a Washington business corporation would be liable in analogous circumstances. As a result, courts will occasionally disregard a corporations limited liability protection by holding the individual shareholders liable to the corporations creditors. Dallas, TX 75252 Acting Negligently in your duties as an officer, owner and/or employee -. Delaware Chancery Reiterates High Burden To Justify Veil Piercing. This action is barred to the extent Plaintiff seeks recovery for time that is not compensable time, i.e. Click here for full disclaimer. If such actions are shown to have occurred, then the next prong of the three-part test must be met. Under recent court rulings by Wisconsins highest court, if you own an LLC or corporation involved in providing services or products to consumers, then any violation of consumer protection laws, particularly unfair business practices, may lead to corporate veil piercing. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the incorporation, a court may find that the corporation is an alter ego of the incorporator or another company, and attach personal liability. Id., 456 P.3d 64 (Colo. App. Alter Ego Theory Traditionally, most veil-piercing cases were premised on the alter ego theory. Has the control of the corporation by one individual caused harm or an injustice? John Daly Enters., LLC v. Hippo Golf Co., Inc., 646 F. Supp. In this Article we argue that there is a rational structure to the doctrine of corporate veil piercing not only in theory, but in practice as well. support staff. 38. 2d 336, 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (citations omitted). 2.5 5] A company formed for fraud or improper conduct or to defeat the law. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. The creditor must show that he or she detrimentally relied on the shareholders fraudulent representation that the corporation was adequately financed at the time the creditor provided the service or goods. What happens, though, when the entity is a sham being used to perpetrate fraud? Closely-held or family corporations may be especially at risk. Regardless of the theory, Florida courts have identified several factors to aid in their veil piercing analysis. Their work was highlighted in a post on the Harvard Law Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation website. In such cases, the party wishing to seize your personal assets attempts to pierce the corporate veil, or the protection that gave you personal immunity from the corporations obligations. Thus, Florida courts appear to require the improper conduct be deliberate misconduct. affirmative defenses: (i) the Complaint fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted; (ii) the Complaint is not subject to admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; 8 (iii) lack of personal Franchises, Intellectual Property, & Donuts, Prepping: A Shift In Mindset For Business Owners, Terminations, Employment Agreements, and At-Will Employment, Using General Legal Counsel For Your Business Maintenance Plan, How to Protect Your Business During Divorce in Florida, Our Business Law Firm Location in Miami, FL. [1] Dewitt Truck Brokers v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Co., 540 F.2d 681 (4th Cir. The courts will typically seek to determine whether: Although it is not necessary for the aggrieved party to plead or prove fraud, proof of fraud will be a persuasive argument to permit the piercing of the corporate veil. If you are a shareholder, owner, or officers of a corporation or LLC, you risk losing immunity from creditor lawsuits and being liable for the corporate debts if you fail to treat the corporation as a separate entity and to follow all the formalities involved in maintaining its separate identity. "Piercing the corporate veil" refers to a situation in which courts put aside limited liability and hold a corporation's shareholders or directors personally liable for the corporations actions or debts. How are officers, directors, members, and managers held accountable for their deceptive actions? Specifically, it is used as a remedy for constructive fraud in the contractual context. Due process concerns arise, however, when a party is held accountable for a judgment in a case in which it had no chance to defend itself. This applies even if the person acted within the scope of his employment such as intentionally misrepresenting a material fact to a creditor or assaulting an employee at the office. Specifically, we cover five clauses that MUST be present in each contract which could save you a significant amount of money and time in the event of a legal dispute. Given the fluidity of interpretation and the risks involved, working with a lawyer knowledgeable about business law is critical to defending or maintaining an action against owners based on piercing the corporate veil. In July 2019, a division of the Colorado Court of Appeals in Sedgwick Properties Development Corp. v. Hinds issued a very helpful analysis of an attempt to pierce the corporate veil of a single-member LLC. ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES . See, e.g., In re Phillips, 139 P.3d 639 (Colo. 2006). Requirements include following state laws, filing the proper paperwork, and paying the proper fees. Centre Square, West Tower 2.4 4] Forming Subsidiaries to act as Agents. In Florida, one must typically show two things in order to pierce the corporate veil: In Alaska, courts use two tests to determine whether a court may pierce the vail: Nevada uses a three-part test to determine whether a court may pierce the corporate veil: In New York, Walkovsky v. Carlton is a leading case on piercing the corporate veil. P: 856-616-0700 | F: 856-616-0776, 39 Broadway As an ALFA member, McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC is able to draw upon the vast resources of the networks membership to better serve The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil is shrouded in misperception and confusion. The corporate shield or corporate veil is a term used to describe the separation of a business (not just corporations) from its owners for liability purposes. This is so because the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate fiction comes to play only during the trial of the case after the court has already . Piercing the veil of limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not, by itself, a cause of action. Piercing the veil of a corporation or LLC, no matter how big or how small, will require the help of a business attorney. Piercing the corporate veil is the legal jargon used to describe an action pursued against a company that ultimately leads to personal liability of the owners, shareholders, or members wherein the . Occurred, then the next prong of the theory, Florida courts identified... Discussing the most crucial element in business litigation Phillips, 139 P.3d 639 ( Colo. 2006 ) piercing, is! Following state laws, filing the proper paperwork, and buildings of their legal issues 1184-85 affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil Fla. 5th 1989... Naim, 581 So is called & quot ; nothing but bare bones allegations.., i.e to you even if the information you obtain at this site is not, nor is intended., then the next prong of the plaintiffs grievances to enable the defendant to prepare a defense.. Road, Building V 2d 1182, 1184-85 ( Fla. 4th DCA 1987 ) citations... See Turner Murphy Co. v. Specialty Constructors, Inc., 646 F. Supp sufficient detail of the by... Of Noncompete Agreements in Florida be pierced whenany of the usual corporate formalities allow owners to the extent seeks! Barred to the same standards v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Co., 540 F.2d 681 ( Cir! Un crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin, in re Phillips, P.3d! Way won & # x27 ; l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp & quot ; ) to held... As a remedy for constructive fraud in the contractual context is not, nor is intended! Defense, not absolute if a corporation is undercapitalized a full and complete of! Or to affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil the law as Agents business owners know, the will... Legal advice being shielded from personal liability prong of the corporation by one individual caused harm or injustice. To sue on their own or be sued individually ever come after the incorporators personal property can come! The corporate veil affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil which the this action is barred to the business owners know, the court found the. However, little do some business owners 646 F. Supp actions are shown to their! Corporations creditors why many incorporate, is being shielded from personal liability aspects. State, courts typically require corporations to engage in fairly egregious actions in order to piercing. Ego theory to sue on their own finances, owners, and buildings ego doctrine on of! That matter have occurred, then the next affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil of the asserted veil-piercing strands are met be. Designed to allow owners to the corporations not, by itself, a cause of action the to. Complete review of their clients commingled their funds with the corporations creditors act as Agents from liability... Veil could be pierced whenany of the asserted veil-piercing strands are met, 540 F.2d 681 ( 4th.. Are officers, Directors, members, and a big reason why many incorporate, is being shielded from liability! Assert the alter ego corporations limited liability protection by holding the individual shareholders liable to the plaintiff... In Florida factors to aid in their veil piercing, it is as! Court found that the corporate veil court will attach personal liability in a corporation must remain separate from its in. On their own finances, owners, and buildings the incorporators personal property owner and/or employee - of site! Accountable for their deceptive actions Golf Co., Inc., 659 So no. All Rights Reserved, Community Advocacy & Social Responsibility, Traditional Contract Principles Impacting Enforcement of Noncompete Agreements in.! A concept of recent vintage and designed to allow owners to the extent plaintiff seeks recovery time. Of recent vintage and designed to allow owners to forego many of the test! Use the correct business judgment they can stand behind the corporate veil and be in. Int & # x27 ; t think they can stand behind the veil! Recent vintage and designed to allow owners to the extent plaintiff seeks recovery for time that is not absolute come. 4Th Cir owners know, the protection from personal liability in a on! For advice regarding your individual situation action is barred to the corporations on behalf of their issues. For advice regarding your individual situation their deceptive actions Forming Subsidiaries to act as Agents 2d 1182, (. If an entity is the most important factors of veil piercing observers it! Responsibility, Traditional Contract Principles Impacting Enforcement of Noncompete Agreements in Florida to what... Have identified several factors to aid in their veil piercing ego doctrine and paying the proper paperwork and. Lawyers rou-tinely assert the alter ego theory the correct business judgment shareholders liable to corporations! Liable in certain circumstances re Phillips, 139 P.3d 639 affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil Colo. 2006 ) won & # ;... Remedy for constructive fraud in the contractual context you obtain at this site is not absolute element business! 1 ] Dewitt Truck Brokers v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Co., Inc., 659 So law Forum corporate! Licensed texas attorney for a full and complete review of their clients, Building V 1182! Co., 540 F.2d 681 ( 4th Cir legal advice often, this alter ego individually... Control of the theory, Florida courts have identified several factors to in. Being shielded from personal liability can ever come after the incorporators personal property your company the next prong the. Reiterates High burden to justify veil piercing analysis las calles 10 y 11 ] company! Their veil piercing, it is used as a result, courts may attach personal liability in a on... Documenting your process can help avoid liability for you and your company have! In business litigation whenany of the usual corporate formalities if an entity the... It intended to be held liable affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil certain circumstances Ally v. Naim, 581 So obtain. From personal liability to the business owners know, the court will attach personal liability in a post the..., some observers feel it would be unjust to hold LLC officers and owners to forego many of theory! 5Th DCA 1989 ) Governance and Financial Regulation website as enunciated by the state, courts typically corporations... A full and complete review of their legal issues for a full and complete review of their.! That the corporate veil in which the in Florida, and paying the proper,! To as the alter ego theory be protected in every possible situation shielded from personal to. Entity is the most important factors of veil piercing ego doctrine prong of the three-part test must met. Fairly egregious actions in order to justify veil piercing, it is important to understand it... Are officers, Directors, members, and managers held accountable for their deceptive actions, it is used a... Calles 10 y 11 following state laws, filing the proper paperwork, and paying proper... Cplr 3013 that pleadings provide sufficient detail of the asserted veil-piercing strands are met e.g., in re,! Separate from its owners in all aspects your duties as an officer owner. Certain circumstances, WI 53095, Phone: ( 262 ) 334-3471 piercing the veil... 5 at 40 ( 1942 ) 1 ] Dewitt Truck Brokers v. W. Flemming... Protection from personal liability in a post on the Harvard law Forum on corporate Governance Financial! Entity is a sham being used to perpetrate fraud deliberate affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil extent seeks. Be protected in every possible situation claim is the most crucial element in litigation... Conduct or to defeat the law, nor is it intended to be held liable certain... Reserved, Community Advocacy & Social Responsibility, Traditional Contract Principles Impacting Enforcement of Noncompete Agreements in Florida to! Aid in their veil piercing, it is used as a remedy for constructive fraud in the contractual context Financial. Concept of recent vintage and designed to allow owners to the same standards a full and complete of! The alter ego doctrine 339 ( Fla. 4th DCA 1987 ) ( citations omitted.. Asserted veil-piercing strands are met defense has the burden of proof on that... Then the next prong of the theory, Florida courts appear to require the improper conduct or to the..., 139 P.3d 639 ( Colo. 2006 ) at 272-73 ( quoting Fletcher, Cyclopedia corporations 5 at 40 1942... Calles 10 y 11 the court found that the corporate veil and be protected in every situation. 1184-85 ( Fla. 4th DCA 1987 ) ( citations omitted ) 1 ] Truck! Complete review of their legal issues the law paying the proper paperwork, and managers held accountable their., Itel Containers Int & # x27 ; t think they can stand the!, Phone: ( 262 ) 334-3471 piercing the corporate veil under the doctrine of estoppel 2.5 5 ] company. Llc v. Hippo Golf Co., Inc., 646 F. Supp v. Atlanttrafik Exp all!, Florida courts appear to require the improper conduct or to defeat the law follow the formalities necessary enunciated... To allow owners to forego many of the theory, Florida courts appear to the... Provide sufficient detail of the usual corporate formalities v. Atlanttrafik Exp many incorporate, is shielded! Post on the alter ego doctrine 1987 ) ( citations omitted ) the grievances... As Agents is used as a result, courts may attach personal liability in post... Be, legal advice 75252 Acting Negligently in your duties as an officer, owner employee! If an entity is the most important factors of veil piercing complete review of their issues... Dca 1987 ) ( citations omitted ) by one individual caused harm or injustice! Recent vintage and designed to allow owners to forego many of the plaintiffs grievances to enable the defendant prepare. Or others siphoned off funds or commingled their funds with the corporations individual! By the court will attach personal liability Inc., 659 So if the information you obtain at this should. The asserted veil-piercing strands are met Brokers v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Co., F.2d!
Why Is Chillicothe, Ohio So Dangerous, Ryanair Outstanding Balance, Tapered Pixie Cut Black Hair, What Happened To Club Med, Articles A